IBGC vs. SPTB
IBGC (iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBGC tracks the ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index while SPTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBGC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTB.
Performance
IBGC vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBGC vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF | 0.21% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGC and SPTB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGC vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank
IBGC
SPTB
IBGC vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGC | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.89 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
IBGC vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum SPTB drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and SPTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGC | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.96% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -2.15% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -1.32% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility
IBGC vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGC | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 3.61% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 4.41% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 4.41% | +3.99% |
IBGC vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGC vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison
IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SPTB's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 4.21% | 4.23% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IBGC and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGC.
SPTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.81% for IBGC.
IBGC tracks ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.03% for SPTB.
Find the right allocation for IBGC and SPTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer