IBGC vs. SGOV
IBGC (iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGC is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. IBGC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
IBGC vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
IBGC vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF | 2.82% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGC and SGOV is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGC vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
IBGC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGOV
IBGC vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBGC | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 194.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 396.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4,438.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBGC vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGC | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -0.03% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -0.00% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
IBGC vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGC | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 0.19% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 0.24% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 0.24% | +8.19% |
IBGC vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGC vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGC and SGOV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBGC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.79% for IBGC.
IBGC is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. IBGC tracks ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.09% for SGOV.
Find the right allocation for IBGC and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer