PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGA vs. AGGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGA vs. AGGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) and WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGA achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than AGGY's 0.40% return.


IBGA

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGGY

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGA vs. AGGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGA and AGGY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024

0.94

The correlation between IBGA and AGGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGA vs. AGGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGA
IBGA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IBGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGY
AGGY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGA vs. AGGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) and WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGAAGGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.10

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

6.17

-3.94

IBGA vs. AGGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the AGGY Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGA and AGGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGAAGGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.40

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.38

-0.17

Drawdowns

IBGA vs. AGGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGA drawdown since its inception was -11.69%, smaller than the maximum AGGY drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGA and AGGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGAAGGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-20.98%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-2.81%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-2.35%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.03%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

0.96%

+1.44%

Volatility

IBGA vs. AGGY - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) at 1.41%. This indicates that IBGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGAAGGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.41%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

3.05%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

4.22%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

6.07%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.86%

5.49%

+4.37%

IBGA vs. AGGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGY's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGA vs. AGGY - Dividend Comparison

IBGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than AGGY's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGGY
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
4.49%4.48%4.38%3.78%2.77%2.10%2.96%3.02%3.36%2.78%3.19%1.27%
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
4.66%4.49%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IBGA and AGGY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBGA has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to AGGY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGA dropped -11.69% vs AGGY's -20.98%.

On 1-year performance, AGGY leads with 5.88% vs 5.33% for IBGA. On fees, IBGA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, AGGY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGGY has performed better with a 5.88% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for AGGY.

IBGA has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.49% for AGGY.

IBGA tracks ICE 2044 Maturity US Treasury Index, while AGGY tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Yield Enhanced. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGA and 0.12% for AGGY.

AGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGA and AGGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer