IBFR vs. SFLR
IBFR (Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBFR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
IBFR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBFR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBFR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBFR Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF | -1.71% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBFR and SFLR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBFR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
IBFR
SFLR
IBFR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF (IBFR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBFR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 1.63 | -2.25 |
Drawdowns
IBFR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBFR drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBFR and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBFR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -12.13% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -2.45% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -1.74% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
IBFR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBFR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 9.26% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 10.23% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 10.23% | -0.52% |
IBFR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBFR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBFR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
IBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SFLR's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBFR Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBFR and SFLR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBFR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBFR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.24% for IBFR.
IBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IBFR and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for IBFR and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer