IBDX vs. VUSV
IBDX (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDX is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2032 Maturity Corporate Index, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. IBDX is passively managed, while VUSV is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.
Performance
IBDX vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than VUSV's 8.98% return.
IBDX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDX vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBDX iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF | 0.32% | 0.93% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 8.98% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDX and VUSV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDX vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank
IBDX
VUSV
IBDX vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDX | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDX | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 2.48 | -1.83 |
Drawdowns
IBDX vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDX drawdown since its inception was -12.51%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDX and VUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDX | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.51% | -7.06% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | 0.00% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -1.30% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility
IBDX vs. VUSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDX | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 12.03% | -8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 12.03% | -4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 12.03% | -4.57% |
IBDX vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDX vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison
IBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDX iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF | 4.82% | 4.81% | 5.02% | 4.59% | 2.39% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDX and VUSV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VUSV.
IBDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
IBDX is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDX and 0.30% for VUSV.
Find the right allocation for IBDX and VUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer