PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCX.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBCX.L is traded in EUR, while IGCB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IGCB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCX.L achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than IGCB.L's 0.65% return.


IBCX.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.44%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
0.73%

IGCB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.59%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.10%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBCX.L
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
0.49%3.14%3.48%7.33%-13.95%-1.48%4.72%
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.65%1.25%6.85%11.52%-22.77%2.24%6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCX.L and IGCB.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020

0.56

The correlation between IBCX.L and IGCB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCX.L
IBCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IGCB.L
IGCB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IGCB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCX.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCX.LIGCB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.46

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

1.07

+1.29

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the IGCB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCX.L and IGCB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCX.LIGCB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.26

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.08

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.04

+0.25

Drawdowns

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.17%, smaller than the maximum IGCB.L drawdown of -32.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCX.L and IGCB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCX.LIGCB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.17%

-32.17%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-4.06%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.73%

-7.63%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-32.17%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-8.01%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-10.85%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.76%

-0.99%

Volatility

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCX.L) is 1.08%, while Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that IBCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGCB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCX.LIGCB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

2.47%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

5.72%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

7.36%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

9.67%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

10.34%

-5.55%

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGCB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCX.L vs. IGCB.L - Dividend Comparison

IBCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than IGCB.L's 5.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCX.L
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
3.07%3.02%2.74%2.31%1.05%0.73%0.84%0.99%1.10%1.09%1.27%1.57%
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
5.27%5.18%5.18%4.26%2.54%1.74%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCX.L and IGCB.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGCB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGCB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCX.L.

IBCX.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while IGCB.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCX.L and 0.10% for IGCB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCX.L and IGCB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer