PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCL.DE achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 14.72% return.


IBCL.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.11%
6M
1.89%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
0.28%
5Y*
-7.37%
10Y*
-2.57%

NQSE.DE

1D
0.35%
1M
-3.37%
6M
16.19%
YTD
14.72%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCL.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.09%-5.38%-0.90%9.73%-34.35%-6.57%11.60%15.55%1.87%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
14.72%18.19%24.02%52.15%-36.27%27.38%45.18%35.63%-15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.05

Over the past year, IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCL.DE
IBCL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IBCL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCL.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.27

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.24

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

7.50

-8.08

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCL.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.80%, which is greater than NQSE.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCL.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.80%

-37.62%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-11.88%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-22.41%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.19%

-37.62%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

-3.42%

-33.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-8.51%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.55%

-0.62%

Volatility

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) is 2.18%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that IBCL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCL.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

7.00%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

13.51%

-6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

17.21%

-8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

21.11%

-7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

21.59%

-10.09%

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCL.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCL.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCL.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.63%3.53%3.19%2.64%1.31%0.53%0.74%1.26%1.50%1.35%1.47%1.83%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCL.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCL.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

IBCL.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. IBCL.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 15-30 Year Index, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBCL.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCL.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer