PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCL.DE achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.DE's 4.60% return.


IBCL.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.11%
6M
1.89%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
0.28%
5Y*
-7.37%
10Y*
-2.57%

BBLL.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
1.78%
6M
4.43%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBCL.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.09%-5.38%-0.90%9.73%-34.35%-6.57%11.60%0.55%
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.60%-7.36%11.29%1.33%7.29%8.35%-8.23%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2019

-0.08

The correlation between IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCL.DE
IBCL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IBCL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCL.DEBBLL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.20

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.00

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

4.74

-5.33

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCL.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.80%, which is greater than BBLL.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCL.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.80%

-17.24%

-26.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-3.38%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-11.65%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.19%

-11.65%

-30.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

-5.47%

-31.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-8.30%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.43%

+1.50%

Volatility

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCL.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) at 1.69%. This indicates that IBCL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCL.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

1.69%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

4.30%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

6.06%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

7.45%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

8.27%

+3.23%

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCL.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLL.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCL.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while BBLL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBCL.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.63%3.53%3.19%2.64%1.31%0.53%0.74%1.26%1.50%1.35%1.47%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBLL.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBLL.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IBCL.DE.

IBCL.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 15-30 Year Index, while BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBCL.DE and 0.07% for BBLL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCL.DE and BBLL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer