IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE
IBCK.DE (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ZA30.DE (iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - IBCK.DE tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility while ZA30.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBCK.DE returned 10.94%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for ZA30.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCK.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ZA30.DE.
Performance
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCK.DE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than ZA30.DE's 11.16% return.
IBCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
ZA30.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCK.DE iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.14% | -0.69% | 25.61% | 6.20% | -3.91% |
ZA30.DE iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.16% | 5.34% | 31.19% | 24.10% | -5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCK.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IBCK.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCK.DE
ZA30.DE
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCK.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.12 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 15.63 | -10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCK.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.47 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.18 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, which is greater than ZA30.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCK.DE and ZA30.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCK.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.11% | -23.45% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.08% | -6.91% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -23.45% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -3.22% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.83% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) is 2.26%, while iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that IBCK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZA30.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCK.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.73% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | 7.54% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.73% | 11.54% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 14.38% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 14.38% | -0.36% |
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCK.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCK.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCK.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCK.DE and ZA30.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCK.DE.
IBCK.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCK.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCK.DE and ZA30.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer