PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCK.DE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than MIVU.DE's 2.88% return.


IBCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
4.61%
YTD
5.14%
6M
5.32%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
10.32%

MIVU.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.60%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.79%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCK.DE
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc)
5.14%-0.69%25.61%6.20%-6.04%35.73%-2.18%34.85%-10.58%
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
2.88%-3.87%22.89%5.36%-4.28%31.88%-5.36%30.00%-5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2018

0.93

The correlation between IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCK.DE
IBCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVU.DE
MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCK.DEMIVU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.52

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

1.15

+4.15

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCK.DEMIVU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.28

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.60

+0.29

Drawdowns

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MIVU.DE drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCK.DEMIVU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-32.69%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-4.83%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-14.89%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-14.89%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-6.68%

+6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-6.16%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.20%

-0.45%

Volatility

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) is 2.26%, while Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that IBCK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIVU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCK.DEMIVU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

2.83%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.71%

6.02%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

8.94%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

11.89%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

13.97%

+0.05%

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCK.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCK.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCK.DE nor MIVU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIVU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCK.DE.

IBCK.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while MIVU.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. IBCK.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility, while MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCK.DE and 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCK.DE and MIVU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer