PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCJ.DE achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than SXRY.DE's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCJ.DE has underperformed SXRY.DE with an annualized return of 9.17%, while SXRY.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


IBCJ.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.95%
YTD
16.30%
6M
26.50%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
29.89%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
9.17%

SXRY.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
2.66%
YTD
14.40%
6M
18.51%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
19.74%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCJ.DE
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.30%53.66%-0.42%43.86%-21.74%14.34%-18.69%-3.73%-9.07%35.59%
SXRY.DE
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
14.40%37.80%18.15%33.34%-9.13%26.71%-4.02%33.22%-14.32%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.53

The correlation between IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCJ.DE
IBCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IBCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRY.DE
SXRY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCJ.DESXRY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.16

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

11.35

-1.75

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCJ.DESXRY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.92

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.07

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.74

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.38

-0.23

Drawdowns

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than SXRY.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCJ.DESXRY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-43.59%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-9.69%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.47%

-17.61%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.31%

-25.00%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-40.81%

-15.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.76%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-11.63%

-7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

2.70%

+1.35%

Volatility

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE) at 4.82%. This indicates that IBCJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCJ.DESXRY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

4.82%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.61%

12.56%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.48%

15.91%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

18.28%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

20.18%

+4.97%

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCJ.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRY.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCJ.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCJ.DE nor SXRY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRY.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRY.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.

IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland, while SXRY.DE tracks FTSE MIB. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBCJ.DE and 0.33% for SXRY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCJ.DE and SXRY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer