IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE
IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland while DBXI.DE tracks the FTSE MIB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCJ.DE returned 9.17%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for DBXI.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCJ.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DBXI.DE.
Performance
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCJ.DE achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than DBXI.DE's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCJ.DE has underperformed DBXI.DE with an annualized return of 9.17%, while DBXI.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
DBXI.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | -9.07% | 35.59% |
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 14.49% | 37.50% | 18.27% | 33.40% | -9.08% | 26.51% | -4.28% | 33.02% | -14.48% | 16.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCJ.DE and DBXI.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IBCJ.DE and DBXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCJ.DE
DBXI.DE
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCJ.DE | DBXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.17 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 11.42 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCJ.DE | DBXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.94 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 1.09 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.75 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.19 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, smaller than the maximum DBXI.DE drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCJ.DE and DBXI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCJ.DE | DBXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.11% | -69.49% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -9.62% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.47% | -17.56% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.31% | -25.10% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.11% | -40.46% | -15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.77% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -29.56% | +10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.67% | +1.38% |
Volatility
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) at 4.63%. This indicates that IBCJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCJ.DE | DBXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 4.63% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.61% | 12.34% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.48% | 15.69% | +7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 18.31% | +8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 20.37% | +4.78% |
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCJ.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCJ.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 3.63% | 3.93% | 4.53% | 3.78% | 7.45% | 0.94% | 4.23% | 3.33% | 2.66% | 1.94% | 2.51% | 0.15% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCJ.DE and DBXI.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXI.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland, while DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IBCJ.DE and 0.30% for DBXI.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCJ.DE and DBXI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer