IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L
IBCI.L (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XG7U.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBCI.L tracks the BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR) while XG7U.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.L returned 1.54%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for XG7U.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCI.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XG7U.L.
Performance
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBCI.L is traded in GBP, while XG7U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XG7U.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than XG7U.L's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.L has outperformed XG7U.L with an annualized return of 1.54%, while XG7U.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.39% annualized return.
IBCI.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 1.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
XG7U.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 1.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.L iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -0.01% | 6.03% | -4.55% | 3.48% | -4.33% | -0.79% | 8.45% | 1.18% | -1.05% | 5.00% |
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged | 1.20% | -2.79% | 1.29% | -1.07% | -7.22% | 6.31% | 6.09% | 4.19% | 5.71% | -5.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.L and XG7U.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IBCI.L and XG7U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.L
XG7U.L
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCI.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.07 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 1.25 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.L drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than XG7U.L's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.L and XG7U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -17.03% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -5.94% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -9.63% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -17.03% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.53% | -17.03% | +2.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -12.26% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -7.97% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 2.42% | -0.88% |
Volatility
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) is 1.41%, while Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that IBCI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.79% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 5.46% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 7.43% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 10.28% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 10.63% | +1.13% |
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7U.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.L vs. XG7U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.L nor XG7U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.L and XG7U.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XG7U.L.
IBCI.L tracks BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR), while XG7U.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.L and 0.25% for XG7U.L.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.L and XG7U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer