IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE
IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCI.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while XDW0.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE returned 1.55%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XDW0.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCI.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.DE's 32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE has underperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 1.55%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 3.15% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | 1.05% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 53.95% | 52.18% | -36.97% | 14.05% | -12.13% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.DE and XDW0.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.05 |
The correlation between IBCI.DE and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.DE
XDW0.DE
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCI.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.98 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 9.92 | -5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCI.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.10 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.84 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -61.44% | +45.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -15.05% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -23.71% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -23.71% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | -61.44% | +45.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -7.38% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -13.84% | +8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 4.53% | -3.75% |
Volatility
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 1.58%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 6.96% | -5.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 18.42% | -15.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 21.48% | -17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 24.04% | -17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 26.02% | -19.86% |
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
IBCI.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XDW0.DE is Energy Equities. IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer