PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 26.79% return.


IBCI.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.29%
YTD
3.01%
6M
2.99%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
2.13%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
1.56%

QUTM.DE

1D
1.41%
1M
9.28%
YTD
26.79%
6M
26.44%
1Y
55.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBCI.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCI.DE
IBCI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCI.DEQUTM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.04

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

5.00

-2.10

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCI.DE and QUTM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum QUTM.DE drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and QUTM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCI.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-24.77%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-24.77%

+22.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-9.00%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-7.74%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

10.14%

-9.35%

Volatility

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 1.61%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCI.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

14.21%

-12.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

24.16%

-21.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

33.44%

-29.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

33.06%

-26.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

33.06%

-26.90%

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCI.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCI.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCI.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

IBCI.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and QUTM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer