PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBCG.DE having a 21.27% return and NS4E.DE slightly lower at 20.94%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBCG.DE having a 14.99% annualized return and NS4E.DE not far ahead at 15.07%.


IBCG.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
1.98%
6M
20.86%
YTD
21.27%
1Y
48.23%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
14.99%

NS4E.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
2.16%
6M
19.66%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCG.DE
iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)
21.27%26.94%22.76%32.85%-5.89%12.06%7.58%16.67%-16.91%18.65%
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
20.94%27.33%22.81%33.35%-4.26%10.90%7.50%17.31%-17.52%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015

0.99

The correlation between IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCG.DE
IBCG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IBCG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCG.DENS4E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

4.83

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

16.73

-0.25

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCG.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NS4E.DE drawdown of -35.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCG.DENS4E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-35.32%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-9.59%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-20.96%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-20.96%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.79%

-35.32%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-1.49%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-8.02%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.77%

+0.15%

Volatility

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) at 5.77%. This indicates that IBCG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NS4E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCG.DENS4E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

5.77%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

15.28%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

19.12%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.19%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

18.25%

+0.20%

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCG.DE has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than NS4E.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCG.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCG.DE nor NS4E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NS4E.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NS4E.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IBCG.DE.

IBCG.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged), while NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IBCG.DE and 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCG.DE and NS4E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer