IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE).
IBCF.DE and 2B7D.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBCF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010. 2B7D.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both IBCF.DE and 2B7D.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCF.DE iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | -4.97% | 15.42% | 22.97% | 23.21% | -21.83% | 28.51% | 14.47% | 27.13% | -8.40% | 14.25% |
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 7.51% | -8.12% | 21.83% | -3.82% | 5.50% | 28.07% | -0.37% | 32.49% | -6.43% | -11.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCF.DE achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7D.DE's 7.51% return.
IBCF.DE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -2.17%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
2B7D.DE
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -6.48%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCF.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7D.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCF.DE
2B7D.DE
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | -0.09 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 0.05 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.12 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | -0.23 | +7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | -0.09 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCF.DE and 2B7D.DE is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCF.DE nor 2B7D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCF.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than 2B7D.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCF.DE and 2B7D.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -26.89% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -16.85% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -16.85% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -9.29% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -8.48% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 8.90% | -6.77% |
Volatility
IBCF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBCF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 4.72% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 23.87% | -14.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 25.89% | -9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 16.27% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.91% | -0.60% |