IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE
IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and PR1T.DE (Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) are both Government Bonds funds - IBCC.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index while PR1T.DE tracks the Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCC.DE returned 4.17%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for PR1T.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBCC.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1T.DE.
Performance
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBCC.DE having a 4.60% return and PR1T.DE slightly lower at 4.54%.
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1T.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 8.42% | -6.87% |
PR1T.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 4.54% | -7.38% | 11.28% | 1.27% | 6.78% | 8.43% | -6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCC.DE and PR1T.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBCC.DE and PR1T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCC.DE
PR1T.DE
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCC.DE | PR1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.01 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 4.78 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, which is greater than PR1T.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and PR1T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCC.DE | PR1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -11.76% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -3.39% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -11.71% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | -11.76% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -5.55% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -5.20% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 1.42% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.DE) at 1.65%. This indicates that IBCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCC.DE | PR1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 1.65% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 4.27% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 6.08% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 7.44% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 7.25% | +1.18% |
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCC.DE vs. PR1T.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while PR1T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
PR1T.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IBCC.DE and PR1T.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1T.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1T.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBCC.DE.
IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while PR1T.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.05% for PR1T.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and PR1T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer