PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IBCC.DE at 4.60% and BBLL.DE at 4.60%.


IBCC.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
1.87%
6M
4.60%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*

BBLL.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
1.78%
6M
4.43%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.60%-7.23%11.42%1.23%7.25%8.42%-8.13%1.44%
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.60%-7.36%11.29%1.33%7.29%8.35%-8.23%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2019

0.96

The correlation between IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCC.DE
IBCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCC.DEBBLL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.00

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

4.74

+0.03

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum BBLL.DE drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCC.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-17.24%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-3.38%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-11.65%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-11.65%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-5.47%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-8.30%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.43%

0.00%

Volatility

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) at 1.69%. This indicates that IBCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCC.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.69%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

4.30%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

6.06%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

7.45%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

8.27%

+0.16%

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while BBLL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.99%4.63%6.49%4.14%0.47%0.09%1.39%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and BBLL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer