PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCA.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCA.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than EAH.DE's 1.55% return.


IBCA.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.59%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
0.41%

EAH.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.73%
1Y
0.28%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
-5.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBCA.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.49%2.32%3.06%3.49%-4.26%-0.39%
EAH.DE
Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
1.55%-2.11%-0.57%8.84%-30.65%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCA.DE and EAH.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.76

The correlation between IBCA.DE and EAH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCA.DE
IBCA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IBCA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EAH.DE
EAH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCA.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCA.DEEAH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.06

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

0.13

+3.28

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCA.DE and EAH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.31%, smaller than the maximum EAH.DE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA.DE and EAH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCA.DEEAH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-36.30%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.14%

-4.72%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.14%

-7.80%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.21%

-36.30%

+31.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-28.52%

+28.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-25.33%

+24.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.11%

-1.74%

Volatility

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCA.DE) is 0.36%, while Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that IBCA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCA.DEEAH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

1.69%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

5.31%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

6.50%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.56%

10.79%

-9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

10.79%

-6.98%

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAH.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCA.DE vs. EAH.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while EAH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAH.DE
Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBCA.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.17%2.45%2.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCA.DE and EAH.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EAH.DE.

IBCA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 1-3, while EAH.DE tracks Solactive Euro Government Green Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBCA.DE and 0.20% for EAH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCA.DE and EAH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer