IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE
IBC4.DE (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PRAM.DE (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IBC4.DE tracks the MSCI South Africa Capped Index while PRAM.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBC4.DE returned 22.90%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for PRAM.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBC4.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PRAM.DE.
Performance
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC4.DE achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than PRAM.DE's 23.36% return.
IBC4.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 1Y
- 32.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
PRAM.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 40.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC4.DE iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.83% | 57.35% | 14.83% | -3.10% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
PRAM.DE Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 23.36% | 17.03% | 13.52% | 7.05% | -12.45% | -15.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC4.DE and PRAM.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IBC4.DE and PRAM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC4.DE
PRAM.DE
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBC4.DE) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBC4.DE | PRAM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.39 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 5.52 | -1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC4.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, which is greater than PRAM.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC4.DE and PRAM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC4.DE | PRAM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.48% | -29.89% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -16.81% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.54% | -19.02% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.46% | -7.22% | -9.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -15.85% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 7.28% | +1.93% |
Volatility
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBC4.DE) is 8.06%, while Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.DE) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that IBC4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC4.DE | PRAM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 8.85% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.34% | 16.90% | +8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.76% | 28.05% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.63% | 20.65% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 20.65% | +7.19% |
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC4.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC4.DE vs. PRAM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC4.DE nor PRAM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC4.DE and PRAM.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAM.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAM.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBC4.DE.
IBC4.DE tracks MSCI South Africa Capped Index, while PRAM.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBC4.DE and 0.10% for PRAM.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC4.DE and PRAM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer