IBBQ vs. PBPH
IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IBBQ tracks the NASDAQ / Biotechnology while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBBQ charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBBQ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's -1.70% return.
IBBQ
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 38.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.14% | -0.95% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.70% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBBQ and PBPH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBBQ vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IBBQ
PBPH
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBBQ | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.89 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBBQ | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.11 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBBQ drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBBQ and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBBQ | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -11.10% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -9.22% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.83% | -4.20% | -12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | — | — |
Volatility
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBBQ | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 16.83% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 16.83% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 16.83% | +5.02% |
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBBQ has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBBQ vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.88% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBBQ and PBPH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBPH.
IBBQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IBBQ tracks NASDAQ / Biotechnology, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for IBBQ and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IBBQ and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer