PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (IBB1.DE) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBB1.DE is traded in EUR, while ALAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ALAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBB1.DE achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than ALAG.L's 11.54% return.


IBB1.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.33%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
0.63%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*

ALAG.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
11.54%
6M
9.06%
1Y
35.05%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBB1.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
-1.42%6.10%-2.30%1.22%-16.97%-3.92%8.37%5.46%
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
11.55%36.78%-21.71%27.75%15.46%-2.27%-21.09%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IBB1.DE and ALAG.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

-0.10

The correlation between IBB1.DE and ALAG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBB1.DE
IBB1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IBB1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBB1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBB1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBB1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBB1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (IBB1.DE) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBB1.DEALAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

3.41

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.05

10.06

-9.01

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBB1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBB1.DE and ALAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBB1.DEALAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.97

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.46

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.35

-0.46

Drawdowns

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBB1.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, smaller than the maximum ALAG.L drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB1.DE and ALAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBB1.DEALAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.50%

-50.97%

+23.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.42%

-10.22%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.84%

-24.17%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-24.17%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.67%

-10.22%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-11.32%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

3.47%

-2.00%

Volatility

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (IBB1.DE) is 1.82%, while Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that IBB1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBB1.DEALAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

4.99%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

15.37%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

17.72%

-13.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.45%

20.85%

-13.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.05%

25.26%

-18.21%

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBB1.DE and ALAG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBB1.DE vs. ALAG.L - Dividend Comparison

IBB1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while ALAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBB1.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
4.35%4.12%3.98%3.06%2.05%1.15%1.56%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBB1.DE and ALAG.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBB1.DE and ALAG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBB1.DE is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while ALAG.L is Latin America Equities. IBB1.DE tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBB1.DE and ALAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer