PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IB26.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IB26.DE achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than PRAC.DE's 0.60% return.


IB26.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.06%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRAC.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.53%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IB26.DE
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.88%2.79%3.68%3.19%
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
0.60%3.03%4.31%4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IB26.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2023

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IB26.DE and PRAC.DE has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IB26.DE
IB26.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IB26.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB26.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB26.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IB26.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB26.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAC.DE
PRAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IB26.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IB26.DEPRAC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.12

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.70

0.76

+10.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.81

2.65

+52.17

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IB26.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IB26.DE and PRAC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IB26.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

0.63

+2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.62

0.02

+2.60

Drawdowns

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IB26.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB26.DE and PRAC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IB26.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-17.86%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-2.70%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.69%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-6.27%

+6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.78%

-0.74%

Volatility

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IB26.DE) is 0.25%, while Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that IB26.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IB26.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

0.99%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

2.77%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72%

3.26%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.43%

4.55%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.43%

4.73%

-3.30%

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IB26.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IB26.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison

IB26.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while PRAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IB26.DE
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.14%3.24%3.59%1.20%
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IB26.DE and PRAC.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IB26.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IB26.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.

IB26.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2026 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index, while PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IB26.DE and 0.50% for PRAC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IB26.DE and PRAC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer