IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE
IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) and XDWU.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares, while XDWU.DE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. IB1T.DE is actively managed, while XDWU.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, IB1T.DE returned -45.39% vs 18.42% for XDWU.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB1T.DE achieves a -26.15% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.DE's 11.86% return.
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -30.99%
- YTD
- -26.15%
- 1Y
- -45.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.82%
XDWU.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.47%
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.15% | -15.22% |
XDWU.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 11.86% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IB1T.DE
XDWU.DE
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB1T.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 2.51 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 6.25 | -7.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than XDWU.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB1T.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -42.00% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.30% | -7.30% | -45.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.41% | -2.01% | -46.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -12.43% | -10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.99% | 2.94% | +30.05% |
Volatility
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) at 3.61%. This indicates that IB1T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB1T.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 3.61% | +6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.15% | 10.26% | +19.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 13.13% | +27.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 14.25% | +25.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 18.02% | +22.20% |
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IB1T.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB1T.DE nor XDWU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IB1T.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XDWU.DE is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and XDWU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer