IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE
IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) and XDEM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares, while XDEM.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. IB1T.DE is actively managed, while XDEM.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, IB1T.DE returned -40.55% vs 31.52% for XDEM.DE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB1T.DE achieves a -26.48% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 22.76% return.
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -21.23%
- YTD
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -30.96%
- 1Y
- -40.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.DE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 22.76%
- 6M
- 23.73%
- 1Y
- 31.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.48% | -15.22% |
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 22.76% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IB1T.DE
XDEM.DE
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IB1T.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.34 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 3.47 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 13.27 | -14.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IB1T.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 1.86 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.81 | 0.90 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.39%, which is greater than XDEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB1T.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.39% | -30.93% | -18.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.39% | -9.05% | -40.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.64% | -0.95% | -47.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -5.97% | -14.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.18% | 2.36% | +25.82% |
Volatility
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) at 5.80%. This indicates that IB1T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB1T.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 5.80% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 14.20% | +16.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 16.85% | +22.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 17.30% | +22.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 17.85% | +22.42% |
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IB1T.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB1T.DE nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IB1T.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XDEM.DE is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.
Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and XDEM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer