PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and 21Shares Tezos ETP (AXTZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IB1T.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
6M
-30.99%
YTD
-26.15%
1Y
-45.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-29.82%

AXTZ.DE

1D
0.87%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
IB1T.DE
iShares Bitcoin ETP
0.00%
AXTZ.DE
21Shares Tezos ETP
0.87%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IB1T.DE
IB1T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IB1T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB1T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB1T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IB1T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB1T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AXTZ.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and 21Shares Tezos ETP (AXTZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IB1T.DEAXTZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IB1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than AXTZ.DE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB1T.DE and AXTZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IB1T.DEAXTZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

0.00%

-52.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.41%

0.00%

-48.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.07%

0.00%

-23.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.99%

Volatility

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IB1T.DEAXTZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.22%

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IB1T.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AXTZ.DE's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IB1T.DE vs. AXTZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IB1T.DE nor AXTZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IB1T.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IB1T.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for AXTZ.DE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IB1T.DE and 2.50% for AXTZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and AXTZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer