IAUS.L vs. PADV.L
IAUS.L (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IAUS.L tracks the MSCI Australia Index (Net) while PADV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAUS.L returned 7.93%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for PADV.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PADV.L.
Performance
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IAUS.L is traded in USD, while PADV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PADV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUS.L achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than PADV.L's 6.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IAUS.L has outperformed PADV.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while PADV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.55% annualized return.
IAUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 11.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.87%
PADV.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 11.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.21%
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.07% | 13.86% | 1.70% | 13.84% | -5.50% | 8.27% | 9.46% | 21.85% | -12.47% | 20.13% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 6.47% | 23.25% | 4.82% | 14.97% | -15.76% | 3.00% | -0.27% | 21.46% | -9.18% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUS.L and PADV.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IAUS.L and PADV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Basic Materials
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Consumer Cyclical
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Real Estate
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Healthcare
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Industrials
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Consumer Defensive
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Energy
IAUS.L
PADV.L
-
Communication Services
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Utilities
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Technology
IAUS.L
PADV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L — Risk / Return Rank
IAUS.L
PADV.L
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 3.45 | -0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PADV.L drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUS.L and PADV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.76% | -42.71% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -8.27% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -14.38% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -33.61% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.76% | -35.54% | -9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -2.42% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -17.77% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.44% | +0.54% |
Volatility
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that IAUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 2.93% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 9.60% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 12.44% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 15.12% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 15.33% | +5.41% |
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PADV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUS.L vs. PADV.L - Dividend Comparison
IAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.80% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 2.94% | 3.44% | 2.90% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 2.14% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUS.L and PADV.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAUS.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAUS.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PADV.L.
IAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia Index (Net), while PADV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IAUS.L and 0.55% for PADV.L.
Find the right allocation for IAUS.L and PADV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer