IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L
IAUS.L (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index (Net), while IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAUS.L returned 7.93%/yr vs 20.46%/yr for IDTW.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDTW.L.
Performance
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUS.L achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 58.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IAUS.L has underperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.46% annualized return.
IAUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 11.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.87%
IDTW.L
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- 6M
- 49.55%
- YTD
- 58.99%
- 1Y
- 81.14%
- 3Y*
- 41.20%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.07% | 13.86% | 1.70% | 13.84% | -5.50% | 8.27% | 9.46% | 21.85% | -12.47% | 20.13% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 58.99% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 34.35% | 34.44% | -9.12% | 28.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUS.L and IDTW.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IAUS.L and IDTW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
Financial Services
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Basic Materials
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Consumer Cyclical
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Real Estate
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
-
Healthcare
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Industrials
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Consumer Defensive
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Energy
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
-
Communication Services
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Utilities
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
-
Technology
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IAUS.L
IDTW.L
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUS.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 5.58 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 17.71 | -14.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.76%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUS.L and IDTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUS.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.76% | -60.07% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -14.46% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -28.24% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -40.98% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.76% | -40.98% | -3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -10.39% | +6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -12.59% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 4.57% | -0.59% |
Volatility
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.55%. This indicates that IAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUS.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 12.55% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 25.11% | -11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 28.56% | -12.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 24.04% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 22.46% | -1.72% |
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUS.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison
IAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUS.L iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.95% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUS.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAUS.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAUS.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
IAUS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. IAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia Index (Net), while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IAUS.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.
Find the right allocation for IAUS.L and IDTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer