IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L).
IAUP.L and ESGP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. ESGP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Jul 2, 2021. Both IAUP.L and ESGP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 5.63% | 153.95% | 11.53% | 9.39% | -11.06% | -5.55% |
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 5.40% | 154.57% | 1.45% | 4.87% | -8.78% | -5.30% |
Different Trading Currencies
IAUP.L is traded in USD, while ESGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IAUP.L having a 5.63% return and ESGP.L slightly lower at 5.40%.
IAUP.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 100.53%
- 3Y*
- 42.85%
- 5Y*
- 23.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
ESGP.L
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -22.11%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 100.22%
- 3Y*
- 37.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IAUP.L
ESGP.L
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAUP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 2.36 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 2.66 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.36 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.77 | 11.47 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAUP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.36 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.59 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUP.L and ESGP.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUP.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUP.L drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, which is greater than ESGP.L's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUP.L and ESGP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.95% | -36.54% | -43.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.57% | -28.67% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.06% | -20.65% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.90% | -13.27% | -36.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 8.04% | +0.13% |
Volatility
IAUP.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a higher volatility of 17.11% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) at 15.90%. This indicates that IAUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAUP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.11% | 15.90% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.16% | 34.36% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.34% | 42.21% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 35.59% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 35.59% | -1.02% |