IAUG vs. NAUG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF (IAUG) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG).

IAUG and NAUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUG is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jul 31, 2024. NAUG is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jul 31, 2024.

Performance

IAUG vs. NAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF (IAUG) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAUG vs. NAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IAUG Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF	0.68%	17.50%	-1.12%
NAUG Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF	-2.10%	14.81%	7.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than NAUG's -2.10% return.

IAUG

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAUG

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -2.10%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUG vs. NAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.

IAUG

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF

NAUG

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

Return for Risk

IAUG vs. NAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUG

IAUG Risk / Return Rank: 75
IAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
IAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
IAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

NAUG

NAUG Risk / Return Rank: 80
NAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUG vs. NAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF (IAUG) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IAUG	NAUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.32	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.06	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.08	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	11.32	-3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IAUG vs. NAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the NAUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUG and NAUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAUG	NAUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.32	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	1.02	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between IAUG and NAUG is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IAUG vs. NAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAUG nor NAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAUG vs. NAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUG drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum NAUG drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUG and NAUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAUG	NAUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-12.88%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.77%	-7.94%	+2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-3.28%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-1.30%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.46%	+0.11%

Volatility

IAUG vs. NAUG - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF (IAUG) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAUG	NAUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.67%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.12%	6.18%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.79%	12.51%	-2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.25%	11.66%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.25%	11.66%	-2.41%