PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAS vs. RIGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAS vs. RIGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IAS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RIGL

1D
8.57%
1M
23.16%
YTD
-16.58%
6M
-19.09%
1Y
88.75%
3Y*
28.60%
5Y*
-3.32%
10Y*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAS vs. RIGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
0.00%-0.96%-27.45%63.71%-60.42%0.95%
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-16.58%154.64%16.00%-3.33%-43.40%-40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IAS and RIGL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.23

The correlation between IAS and RIGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAS:

$1.76B

RIGL:

$703.38M

EPS

IAS:

$0.28

RIGL:

$19.21

PE Ratio

IAS:

37.31

RIGL:

1.86

PEG Ratio

IAS:

0.22

RIGL:

0.00

PS Ratio

IAS:

2.95

RIGL:

2.26

PB Ratio

IAS:

1.59

RIGL:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAS:

$590.67M

RIGL:

$299.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAS:

$457.31M

RIGL:

$279.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

IAS:

$119.85M

RIGL:

$125.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAS vs. RIGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RIGL
RIGL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RIGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAS vs. RIGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IASRIGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

IAS vs. RIGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAS vs. RIGL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IASRIGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.85%

Volatility

IAS vs. RIGL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IASRIGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.86%

Dividends

IAS vs. RIGL - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAS nor RIGL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IAS vs. RIGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
154.36M
58.82M
(IAS) Total Revenue
(RIGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IAS vs. RIGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
77.0%
92.2%
Portfolio components
IAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.81M and revenue of 154.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.0%.

RIGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.

IAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 7.57M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

RIGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

IAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a net income of 7.05M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

RIGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAS and RIGL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAS and RIGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer