PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IARCX vs. FIKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IARCX achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 3.43% return.


IARCX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
10.56%
6M
10.02%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
3.39%

FIKMX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
3.43%
6M
4.00%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IARCX
Invesco Real Estate Fund
10.56%-0.91%1.03%7.95%-25.40%39.81%-11.68%26.50%-2.90%
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
3.43%7.29%8.03%9.51%-14.48%19.04%-0.98%18.04%-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IARCX and FIKMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.89

The correlation between IARCX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IARCX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IARCX
IARCX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKMX
FIKMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IARCXFIKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.38

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.40

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

10.40

-7.48

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IARCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FIKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IARCX and FIKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IARCXFIKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.03

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.57

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.55

-0.53

Drawdowns

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IARCX drawdown since its inception was -82.76%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IARCX and FIKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IARCXFIKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.76%

-34.49%

-48.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-3.43%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-7.16%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-18.04%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.87%

-0.64%

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.14%

-5.15%

-30.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.79%

+2.12%

Volatility

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.16%. This indicates that IARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IARCXFIKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

1.16%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

3.08%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

4.05%

+9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

6.48%

+12.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

10.59%

+10.25%

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IARCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IARCX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison

IARCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, which matches FIKMX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
4.67%4.80%4.81%5.15%6.24%1.59%4.90%5.82%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IARCX
Invesco Real Estate Fund
4.65%5.26%3.66%2.50%9.87%4.94%6.58%7.98%6.65%5.22%14.83%16.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IARCX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IARCX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FIKMX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IARCX dropped -82.76% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.

FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IARCX and FIKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer