PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAPD.L is traded in GBp, while IQQX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IQQX.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAPD.L achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than IQQX.DE's 12.44% return. Over the past 10 years, IAPD.L has outperformed IQQX.DE with an annualized return of 9.65%, while IQQX.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.


IAPD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.77%
YTD
13.20%
6M
13.76%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
9.65%

IQQX.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
12.44%
6M
12.72%
1Y
38.04%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
13.20%22.91%9.51%8.99%11.40%6.82%-11.63%11.98%-8.55%8.25%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
12.44%20.75%7.58%6.81%8.44%3.89%-14.27%10.73%-10.01%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IAPD.L and IQQX.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.84

The correlation between IAPD.L and IQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAPD.L
IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQX.DE
IQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAPD.LIQQX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.62

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

5.28

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.30

18.83

+1.47

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is comparable to the IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAPD.L and IQQX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAPD.LIQQX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89

3.41

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.80

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.21

+0.34

Drawdowns

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAPD.L drawdown since its inception was -52.66%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -59.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPD.L and IQQX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAPD.LIQQX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.66%

-59.43%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-7.17%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-18.28%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

-18.28%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.53%

-38.76%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.91%

-3.22%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-11.24%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.02%

+0.04%

Volatility

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) at 3.10%. This indicates that IAPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAPD.LIQQX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.10%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

8.72%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

11.12%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

12.68%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.59%

-0.13%

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAPD.L and IQQX.DE have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

IAPD.L vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison

IAPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than IQQX.DE's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
4.89%5.67%6.72%7.29%8.34%7.53%4.77%7.26%7.70%6.15%5.60%8.10%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
3.12%3.64%4.84%5.36%6.66%4.62%3.16%4.85%5.09%4.16%4.03%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAPD.L and IQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAPD.L and IQQX.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAPD.L and IQQX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer