PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IAPD.AS) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAPD.AS is traded in EUR, while WITS.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WITS.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


IAPD.AS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WITS.AS

1D
-1.66%
1M
15.19%
YTD
25.11%
6M
23.41%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
21.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IAPD.AS
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
0.00%12.38%13.48%9.69%4.51%13.14%-16.78%0.88%
WITS.AS
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF
25.11%7.87%36.46%55.38%-29.14%39.85%32.58%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IAPD.AS and WITS.AS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between IAPD.AS and WITS.AS has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAPD.AS

WITS.AS
WITS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WITS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IAPD.AS) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAPD.ASWITS.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

Drawdowns

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAPD.ASWITS.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

Volatility

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAPD.ASWITS.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAPD.AS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WITS.AS's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAPD.AS vs. WITS.AS - Dividend Comparison

IAPD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than WITS.AS's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAPD.AS
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
4.85%5.02%5.58%6.33%7.38%6.33%4.28%6.18%6.90%5.48%4.80%5.95%
WITS.AS
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.46%0.81%0.41%0.73%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAPD.AS and WITS.AS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WITS.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WITS.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.AS.

IAPD.AS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while WITS.AS is Technology Equities. IAPD.AS tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while WITS.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IAPD.AS and 0.25% for WITS.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAPD.AS and WITS.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer