PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (IAA.AX) and Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAA.AX achieves a 29.13% return, which is significantly higher than ROBO.AX's 12.15% return.


IAA.AX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-7.42%
6M
21.37%
YTD
29.13%
1Y
50.46%
3Y*
28.12%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
13.93%
ALL TIME*
9.97%

ROBO.AX

1D
2.47%
1M
-4.92%
6M
12.66%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
20.31%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
A$4.06MA$4.08MA$4.93M
A$625.98KA$648.66KA$856.55K

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF
29.13%36.38%29.68%1.92%-17.59%-5.27%22.79%22.16%-4.60%12.09%
ROBO.AX
Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF
12.15%15.06%8.41%22.97%-28.81%22.23%32.89%29.65%-13.06%12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IAA.AX and ROBO.AX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.52

The correlation between IAA.AX and ROBO.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (5 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAA.AX
IAA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO.AX
ROBO.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ROBO.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (IAA.AX) and Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAA.AXROBO.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.54

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

4.07

+5.67

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the ROBO.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAA.AX and ROBO.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAA.AX drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, which is greater than ROBO.AX's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAA.AX and ROBO.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAA.AXROBO.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-34.87%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.03%

-13.65%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-25.40%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.96%

-34.87%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-8.15%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-9.98%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

5.20%

-0.13%

Volatility

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia 50 ETF (IAA.AX) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO.AX) at 9.44%. This indicates that IAA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAA.AXROBO.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

9.44%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.41%

20.00%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

23.10%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

20.22%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

19.85%

-0.09%

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAA.AX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO.AX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAA.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Dividend Comparison

IAA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than ROBO.AX's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.04%2.16%0.44%1.36%3.40%1.68%1.18%4.31%0.48%1.28%1.78%
ROBO.AX
Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF
10.22%0.20%0.19%0.53%8.00%8.53%0.62%0.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAA.AX and ROBO.AX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAA.AX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAA.AX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ROBO.AX.

IAA.AX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ROBO.AX is Global Equities. IAA.AX tracks S&P Asia 50 Index (Net TR AUD) WM, while ROBO.AX tracks Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for IAA.AX and 0.69% for ROBO.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAA.AX and ROBO.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer