PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IAA.AX (iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)) and FOOD.AX (Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IAA.AX tracks the iShares Asia 50 Index while FOOD.AX tracks the Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAA.AX returned 10.89%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for FOOD.AX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX) and Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAA.AX achieves a 26.96% return, which is significantly higher than FOOD.AX's 13.34% return.

IAA.AX

1D
-6.06%
1M
-10.93%
6M
16.30%
YTD
26.96%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
28.73%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
13.80%

FOOD.AX

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.83%
6M
6.93%
YTD
13.34%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		26.96%36.38%29.68%1.92%-17.59%-5.27%22.79%22.16%-4.60%34.31%
FOOD.AX
Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF		13.34%16.69%-5.50%-5.20%-1.14%24.32%3.36%17.26%-14.88%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IAA.AX and FOOD.AX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016

0.24

The correlation between IAA.AX and FOOD.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)

Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF

Often compared with IAA.AX:
IAA.AX vs. CORE.AXIAA.AX vs. ESGI.AXIAA.AX vs. ESTX.AXIAA.AX vs. F100.AXIAA.AX vs. GLIN.AXIAA.AX vs. HGEN.AXIAA.AX vs. HJPN.AX
Often compared with FOOD.AX:
FOOD.AX vs. DHHF.AXFOOD.AX vs. EX20.AXFOOD.AX vs. F100.AXFOOD.AX vs. FUEL.AXFOOD.AX vs. GEAR.AXFOOD.AX vs. GGUS.AXFOOD.AX vs. GNDQ.AX

Return for Risk

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IAA.AX
IAA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX
FOOD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FOOD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX) and Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IAA.AXFOOD.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.73
1.25

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.18
1.87

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.86

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

5.30

+5.93

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the FOOD.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAA.AX and FOOD.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAA.AX drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, which is greater than FOOD.AX's maximum drawdown of -39.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAA.AX and FOOD.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IAA.AXFOOD.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-39.46%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.31%

-11.06%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-22.20%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.91%

-34.67%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.90%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.31%

-6.10%

-8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-11.38%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

3.90%

+0.28%

Volatility

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX) has a higher volatility of 14.55% compared to Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX) at 3.70%. This indicates that IAA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOOD.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IAA.AXFOOD.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.55%

3.70%

+10.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.36%

13.70%

+10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.53%

16.45%

+10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.20%

17.47%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.49%

+1.94%

Dividends

IAA.AX vs. FOOD.AX - Dividend Comparison

IAA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FOOD.AX's 3.97% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FOOD.AX
Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF		3.97%0.00%1.48%0.00%2.57%3.39%0.00%0.46%3.60%0.00%0.00%
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		1.06%2.16%0.44%1.36%3.40%1.68%1.18%4.31%0.48%1.28%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

IAA.AX and FOOD.AX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAA.AX tracks iShares Asia 50 Index, while FOOD.AX tracks Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAA.AX and FOOD.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer