PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
I500.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

I500.L is traded in GBP, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with I500.L having a 10.61% return and SWDA.L slightly lower at 10.08%.


I500.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.52%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.52%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*

SWDA.L

1D
0.15%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
I500.L
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF
10.61%9.56%27.57%20.04%-8.74%31.23%5.72%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.08%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between I500.L and SWDA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.96

The correlation between I500.L and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
I500.L
SWDA.L

Technology

35.6%
30.0%

Financial Services

11.8%
15.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.7%

Industrials

8.3%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.2%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.2%

Technology

I500.L
35.6%
SWDA.L
30.0%

Financial Services

I500.L
11.8%
SWDA.L
15.4%

Communication Services

I500.L
11.2%
SWDA.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

I500.L
10.1%
SWDA.L
9.0%

Healthcare

I500.L
8.5%
SWDA.L
8.7%

Industrials

I500.L
8.3%
SWDA.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

I500.L
4.9%
SWDA.L
5.2%

Energy

I500.L
3.5%
SWDA.L
4.2%

Utilities

I500.L
2.4%
SWDA.L
2.5%

Real Estate

I500.L
1.9%
SWDA.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

I500.L
1.8%
SWDA.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

I500.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

I500.L
I500.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
I500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
I500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
I500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
I500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
I500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


I500.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.51

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

4.14

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

16.55

-1.33

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current I500.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of I500.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


I500.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.66

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.98

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.88

+0.25

Drawdowns

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum I500.L drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for I500.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


I500.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-25.58%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.55%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.75%

-18.50%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.75%

-18.50%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.10%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-3.49%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.64%

+0.28%

Volatility

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


I500.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.52%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.29%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

10.19%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

13.30%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

14.50%

-0.20%

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

I500.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

I500.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither I500.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, I500.L and SWDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

I500.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD), while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for I500.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for I500.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer