I500.L vs. PQVM.L
I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD) while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, I500.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. I500.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
I500.L is traded in GBP, while PQVM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQVM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, I500.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.63% return.
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- —
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.61% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 17.12% | 5.56% | 32.44% | 1.48% | 12.47% | 27.32% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between I500.L and PQVM.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between I500.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
I500.L
PQVM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
I500.L
PQVM.L
Financial Services
I500.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
I500.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
I500.L
PQVM.L
Healthcare
I500.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
I500.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Defensive
I500.L
PQVM.L
Energy
I500.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
I500.L
PQVM.L
Real Estate
I500.L
PQVM.L
-
Basic Materials
I500.L
PQVM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
I500.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
I500.L
PQVM.L
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| I500.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 5.05 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 16.52 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| I500.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.03 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum I500.L drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, smaller than the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for I500.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| I500.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -26.48% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -4.61% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -17.12% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.75% | -17.12% | -3.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.08% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -4.22% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.41% | +0.51% |
Volatility
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) is 2.59%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that I500.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| I500.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.60% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 9.05% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 11.48% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.83% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 17.14% | -2.84% |
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
I500.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
I500.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
I500.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD), while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for I500.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for I500.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer