I500.L vs. IUES.L
I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - I500.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD), while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, I500.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 21.62%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. I500.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
I500.L is traded in GBP, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, I500.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.94% return.
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 30.94%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 48.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.61% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.94% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 83.32% | 53.38% | 20.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between I500.L and IUES.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between I500.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
I500.L
IUES.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
I500.L
IUES.L
Utilities
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
I500.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
I500.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
I500.L
IUES.L
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| I500.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.35 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.86 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 8.84 | +6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| I500.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.06 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.81 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.36 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum I500.L drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for I500.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| I500.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -62.40% | +41.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -16.59% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -23.92% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.75% | -23.92% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -9.10% | +8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -16.00% | +12.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 5.38% | -3.46% |
Volatility
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) is 2.59%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that I500.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| I500.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 8.67% | -6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 19.52% | -12.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 23.10% | -12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 26.62% | -12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 28.22% | -13.92% |
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
I500.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
I500.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither I500.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
I500.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUES.L.
I500.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD), while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for I500.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for I500.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer