PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, I500.DE achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.


I500.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.45%
6M
10.92%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*

QDVF.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.38%
YTD
32.71%
6M
28.30%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
I500.DE
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.45%4.94%32.50%22.82%-14.07%41.05%7.37%
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
32.71%-2.67%9.20%-3.70%72.13%67.92%21.48%

Correlation

The correlation between I500.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.31

The correlation between I500.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

I500.DE
I500.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
I500.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
I500.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
I500.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
I500.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
I500.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVF.DE
QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


I500.DEQDVF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.54

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

7.98

+4.84

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current I500.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of I500.DE and QDVF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


I500.DEQDVF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.82

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.79

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.28

+0.85

Drawdowns

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum I500.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for I500.DE and QDVF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


I500.DEQDVF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-65.81%

+42.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-17.23%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-27.13%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-27.13%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-8.92%

+8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-17.41%

+13.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

5.49%

-3.48%

Volatility

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.DE) is 2.65%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that I500.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


I500.DEQDVF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

7.70%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

20.43%

-12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

24.05%

-12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

26.95%

-11.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

28.68%

-13.55%

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

I500.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

I500.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither I500.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


I500.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, I500.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

I500.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.

I500.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. I500.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for I500.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for I500.DE and QDVF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer