PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HZEN vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HZEN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HZEN achieves a -39.27% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 23.04% return.


HZEN

1D
-1.16%
1M
-3.07%
6M
-66.40%
YTD
-39.27%
1Y
-43.99%
3Y*
-18.47%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-57.69%

BITI

1D
-1.35%
1M
-3.89%
6M
34.67%
YTD
23.04%
1Y
59.90%
3Y*
-31.96%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-36.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HZEN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HZEN
Grayscale Horizen Trust
-39.27%-83.06%164.86%236.36%-43.30%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
23.04%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HZEN and BITI is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.34

The correlation between HZEN and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.50 (1 year) to -0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HZEN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HZEN
HZEN Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HZEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HZEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HZEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HZEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HZEN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HZEN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HZENBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.23

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

2.38

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

5.89

-6.63

HZEN vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HZEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HZEN and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HZEN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HZEN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than BITI's maximum drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HZEN and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HZENBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-92.16%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.69%

-25.28%

-56.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.24%

-84.63%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.32%

-86.57%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.04%

-68.43%

-23.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.46%

10.20%

+49.26%

Volatility

HZEN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.54%. This indicates that HZEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HZENBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

10.54%

+11.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.53%

34.05%

+38.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.16%

44.17%

+91.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

149.33%

52.19%

+97.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

149.33%

52.19%

+97.14%

Dividends

HZEN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

HZEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.80%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.80%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
HZEN
Grayscale Horizen Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HZEN and BITI have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HZEN has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to BITI (10.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HZEN dropped -98.73% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, HZEN leads with -18.47% vs -31.96% for BITI. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HZEN has performed better with a -18.47% return vs -31.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.80%, compared with 0.00% for HZEN.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HZEN and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer