PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYZD vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYZD vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYZD achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.50% return.


HYZD

1D
0.35%
1M
0.87%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.60%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
5.60%

NTSX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.50%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYZD vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
2.88%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%6.27%-0.63%9.17%-4.67%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.50%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HYZD and NTSX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.46

The correlation between HYZD and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYZD vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYZD
NTSX

Energy

100.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.5%

Financial Services

-

12.3%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

-

35.1%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Energy

HYZD
100.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Basic Materials

HYZD

-

NTSX
1.4%

Communication Services

HYZD

-

NTSX
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HYZD

-

NTSX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

HYZD

-

NTSX
5.5%

Financial Services

HYZD

-

NTSX
12.3%

Healthcare

HYZD

-

NTSX
8.4%

Industrials

HYZD

-

NTSX
7.7%

Real Estate

HYZD

-

NTSX
1.5%

Technology

HYZD

-

NTSX
35.1%

Utilities

HYZD

-

NTSX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYZD vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYZD vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYZDNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

2.81

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

12.44

+5.02

HYZD vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYZD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYZD and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYZDNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.09

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.58

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.72

-0.21

Drawdowns

HYZD vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYZD drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYZD and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYZDNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-31.34%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-9.16%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-16.82%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

-31.34%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-6.79%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

2.07%

-1.62%

Volatility

HYZD vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) is 1.00%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that HYZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYZDNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

3.38%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

9.61%

-7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

12.32%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

17.04%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

18.27%

-9.70%

HYZD vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYZD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYZD vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

HYZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than NTSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.87%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.07%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYZD and NTSX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to HYZD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYZD dropped -25.66% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.87% vs 6.30% for HYZD. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 1.07% for NTSX.

HYZD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HYZD and 0.20% for NTSX.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYZD and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer