PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYZD vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYZD vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYZD achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.73% return.


HYZD

1D
0.35%
1M
0.87%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.60%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
5.60%

BBHY

1D
0.15%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYZD vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
2.88%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%6.27%-0.63%9.17%-2.21%6.32%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.73%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HYZD and BBHY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.51

The correlation between HYZD and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYZD vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYZD
BBHY

Energy

100.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Financial Services

-

4.1%

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Technology

-

4.0%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Energy

HYZD
100.0%
BBHY
5.2%

Basic Materials

HYZD

-

BBHY
3.2%

Communication Services

HYZD

-

BBHY
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HYZD

-

BBHY
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

HYZD

-

BBHY
2.5%

Financial Services

HYZD

-

BBHY
4.1%

Healthcare

HYZD

-

BBHY
5.4%

Industrials

HYZD

-

BBHY
8.4%

Real Estate

HYZD

-

BBHY
3.9%

Technology

HYZD

-

BBHY
4.0%

Utilities

HYZD

-

BBHY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYZD vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYZD vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYZDBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.00

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

13.50

+3.96

HYZD vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYZD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYZD and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYZDBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.97

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.57

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.64

-0.14

Drawdowns

HYZD vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYZD drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, roughly equal to the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYZD and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYZDBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-24.98%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-2.37%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-5.00%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

-15.32%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-2.37%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.53%

-0.08%

Volatility

HYZD vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) is 1.00%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that HYZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYZDBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.13%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.85%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

3.62%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

7.26%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

7.53%

+1.04%

HYZD vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYZD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYZD vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

HYZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.94%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.87%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYZD and BBHY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to HYZD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYZD dropped -25.66% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, HYZD leads with 6.30% vs 4.12% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYZD has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 5.87% for HYZD.

HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HYZD and 0.15% for BBHY.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYZD and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer