PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYXF vs. PSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYXF vs. PSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYXF vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.72%8.88%8.35%0.17%
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
0.76%7.34%7.96%0.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYXF achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than PSH's 0.76% return.


HYXF

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*

PSH

1D
0.35%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYXF vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYXF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYXF vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYXF
HYXF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HYXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PSH
PSH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYXF vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYXFPSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.68

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

2.54

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.34

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.58

10.93

-7.35

HYXF vs. PSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYXF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the PSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYXF and PSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYXFPSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.68

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

2.20

-1.60

Correlation

The correlation between HYXF and PSH is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HYXF vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison

HYXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than PSH's 6.98% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.26%6.19%6.40%5.93%5.37%4.56%4.96%5.29%6.14%5.85%3.16%
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
6.98%6.62%8.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HYXF vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYXF drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, which is greater than PSH's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYXF and PSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYXFPSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-3.06%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-2.84%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

0.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-0.27%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

0.61%

+1.26%

Volatility

HYXF vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) at 1.59%. This indicates that HYXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYXFPSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

1.59%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

2.00%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.00%

3.94%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.03%

3.30%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

3.30%

+5.08%