HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L
HYUS.L (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and GHYG.L (iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - HYUS.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while GHYG.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYUS.L returned 8.87%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for GHYG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GHYG.L.
Performance
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HYUS.L is traded in USD, while GHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GHYG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYUS.L achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than GHYG.L's 0.62% return.
HYUS.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYG.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYUS.L iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.22% | 8.62% | 8.28% | 12.85% | -5.88% |
GHYG.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.62% | 16.06% | 5.18% | 16.98% | -11.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYUS.L and GHYG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HYUS.L and GHYG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYUS.L
GHYG.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HYUS.L
GHYG.L
Basic Materials
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Communication Services
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Energy
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Financial Services
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Healthcare
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Industrials
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Technology
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
-
Utilities
HYUS.L
-
GHYG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYUS.L
GHYG.L
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYUS.L | GHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.69 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 1.95 | +10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYUS.L | GHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.54 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.30 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYUS.L drawdown since its inception was -10.49%, smaller than the maximum GHYG.L drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUS.L and GHYG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYUS.L | GHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -34.28% | +23.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -6.45% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.06% | -9.16% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.53% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -8.02% | +6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.28% | -1.72% |
Volatility
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L) is 1.39%, while iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that HYUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYUS.L | GHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 2.53% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 6.22% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 8.27% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 12.02% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 13.56% | -6.87% |
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYUS.L vs. GHYG.L - Dividend Comparison
HYUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than GHYG.L's 5.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 5.38% | 5.34% | 5.26% | 4.69% | 4.15% | 3.73% | 4.54% | 1.79% |
HYUS.L iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.21% | 7.38% | 7.54% | 6.30% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYUS.L and GHYG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYG.L.
HYUS.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYG.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUS.L and 0.55% for GHYG.L.
Find the right allocation for HYUS.L and GHYG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer