PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTR vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTR vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.51% return.


HYTR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.72%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

HYG

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
0.35%5.95%7.25%8.31%-11.29%2.75%-0.95%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.51%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and HYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.78

The correlation between HYTR and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYTR vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYTR
HYG

Energy

90.3%

-

Technology

9.3%

-

Real Estate

0.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

99.6%

Energy

HYTR
90.3%
HYG

-

Technology

HYTR
9.3%
HYG

-

Real Estate

HYTR
0.5%
HYG
0.4%

Basic Materials

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Communication Services

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Consumer Defensive

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Financial Services

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Healthcare

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Industrials

HYTR

-

HYG

-

Utilities

HYTR

-

HYG
99.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTR vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTR
HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTRHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.79

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

12.34

-4.73

HYTR vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTRHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.72

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.46

-0.16

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTRHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-34.25%

+21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-2.34%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

-4.56%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.25%

-15.79%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.09%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-3.24%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.53%

+0.16%

Volatility

HYTR vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 1.09%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTRHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.21%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

3.01%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

3.81%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

7.53%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

8.29%

-2.43%

HYTR vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTR vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than HYG's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
5.70%5.78%5.55%5.43%1.24%3.70%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, HYTR and HYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to HYTR (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 5-year performance, HYG leads with 3.81% vs 2.09% for HYTR. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYG has performed better with a 3.81% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 5.70% for HYTR.

HYTR tracks CP High Yield Trend Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.49% for HYG.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTR and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer