HYTR vs. BBHY
Compare and contrast key facts about CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY).
HYTR and BBHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYTR is a passively managed fund by Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC that tracks the performance of the CP High Yield Trend Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2020. BBHY is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. It was launched on Sep 15, 2016. Both HYTR and BBHY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HYTR vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYTR vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | -0.97% | 5.95% | 7.25% | 8.31% | -11.29% | 2.75% | -0.95% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 4.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 0.13% return.
HYTR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYTR vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HYTR vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYTR
BBHY
HYTR vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYTR | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.81 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.67 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 9.00 | -5.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYTR | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.56 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.63 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYTR and BBHY is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HYTR vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than BBHY's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | 5.88% | 5.78% | 5.55% | 5.43% | 1.24% | 3.70% | 3.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.13% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
HYTR vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and BBHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYTR | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -24.98% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -3.14% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.25% | -15.32% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -0.87% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -2.41% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.80% | +0.24% |
Volatility
HYTR vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 1.76%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYTR | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 2.16% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 5.72% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 7.24% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 7.58% | -1.68% |