PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (HYSD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYSD.L is traded in GBP, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD.L achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -6.40% return.


HYSD.L

1D
0.36%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.62%
YTD
2.22%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
8.23%
5Y*
10Y*

SGLN.L

1D
-1.61%
1M
-7.43%
6M
-12.76%
YTD
-6.40%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
26.03%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
2.22%8.24%7.60%11.75%-3.60%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-6.40%53.66%28.20%7.24%3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSD.L and SGLN.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.04

Over the past year, HYSD.L and SGLN.L have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (HYSD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSD.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

0.84

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

2.08

+9.02

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD.L drawdown since its inception was -9.53%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSD.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-53.23%

+43.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-24.33%

+21.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-24.33%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.33%

+24.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-24.68%

+23.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

9.87%

-9.32%

Volatility

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (HYSD.L) is 0.97%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that HYSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSD.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

6.72%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

21.25%

-18.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

24.49%

-20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

22.01%

-15.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.09%

18.34%

-12.25%

Dividends

HYSD.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
11.04%7.39%7.39%5.61%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSD.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. HYSD.L tracks iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer