PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYSD.L is traded in GBP, while GHYU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GHYU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD.L achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than GHYU.L's 1.28% return.


HYSD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.29%
YTD
1.97%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
10Y*

GHYU.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.98%
6M
0.68%
YTD
1.28%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.97%8.24%7.60%11.75%-3.60%
GHYU.L
Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc
1.28%3.46%6.93%6.73%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSD.L and GHYU.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYU.L
GHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSD.LGHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.44

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

3.94

+6.00

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD.L and GHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD.L drawdown since its inception was -9.53%, smaller than the maximum GHYU.L drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD.L and GHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSD.LGHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-10.97%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-3.45%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-7.00%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.36%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-2.81%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

1.26%

-0.71%

Volatility

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) is 0.91%, while Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that HYSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSD.LGHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.60%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

5.20%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

6.54%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

8.22%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

9.48%

-3.40%

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HYSD.L vs. GHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, while GHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD.L and GHYU.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYSD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYSD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GHYU.L.

HYSD.L tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while GHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for HYSD.L and 0.25% for GHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD.L and GHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer